Never End News


Iran Says Ready to Swap Prisoners With United States

Iranian media quoted a foreign ministry spokesman Wednesday saying that Iran is prepared to swap prisoners with the United States.

The semi-official FARS news agency quoted spokesman Nasser Kanaani as calling on U.S. President Joe Biden’s administration to “act instead of performing theatrical shows.”

U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken called attention Tuesday to the case of Iranian-American Siamak Namazi, saying that Namazi has been “wrongfully detained in Iran” for 2,500 days.

“We are determined to secure his freedom and ensure all Americans who have been wrongfully detained by Iran, including his father, Baquer, can return home,” Blinken tweeted.

State Department spokesman Ned Price said the U.S. side believes those being held in Iran are “being held as political pawns, presumably on the part of the Iranian regime ... in an effort to seek to exact leverage or some other concession.”

“It is a practice that is abhorrent. It is a practice that we condemn anywhere and everywhere it takes place,” Price added.

He said seeking the release of American detainees is not tied to the ongoing negotiations about returning to the international agreement signed in 2015 restricting Iran’s nuclear activity in exchange for sanctions relief.

The U.S. said separately Tuesday it is studying Iran’s response to a final European Union-brokered proposal on reviving the accord.

The State Department said it received the Iran document from the EU and would share a U.S. response with its European allies.

The official IRNA news agency in Tehran reported Tuesday that Iranian negotiators had submitted their reply to the European Union and suggested they still wouldn't accept the EU proposal, despite warnings there would be no more negotiations.

“The differences are on three issues, in which the United States has expressed its verbal flexibility in two cases, but it should be included in the text,” the IRNA report said. “The third issue is related to guaranteeing the continuation of [the deal], which depends on the realism of the United States.”

"Iran has submitted a written response to the draft text of a Vienna agreement and has announced that an agreement will be concluded if the United States reacts with realism and flexibility," the agency reported.

IRNA earlier quoted Iranian Foreign Minister Hossein Amir-Abdollahian as saying, "The American side has verbally accepted the two demands" made by Tehran.

A spokesman for the EU's top diplomat, Josep Borrell, confirmed that Tehran had submitted its response and that it was being reviewed.

"We are studying it and are consulting with the other JCPOA participants and the U.S. on the way ahead," the spokesperson said, referring to the formal title of the 2015 nuclear pact.

He did not give any details on what the response contained.

The possibility of reviving the deal, which could lead to the lifting of U.S. sanctions on Iran's oil output, has helped trigger a fall in global oil prices.

The landmark agreement has been on hold since U.S. President Donald Trump withdrew from it in 2018, and reimposed crippling economic sanctions against Iran.

The main countries negotiating with Iran have been waiting for Tehran's response to the final draft Borrell submitted last week.

IRNA quoted an unidentified Iranian diplomat as saying, "The European Union's proposals were acceptable so long as they provide assurances to Iran on various points related to sanctions and safeguards" as well as pending issues with the International Atomic Energy Agency.

Britain, China, France, Germany, and Russia resumed talks with Iran on the accord earlier in August after a months-long hiatus. The United States has been participating indirectly.

Some information for this report came from The Associated Press, Agence France-Presse and Reuters.

Thanks for reading our article Iran Says Ready to Swap Prisoners With United States . Please share it with responsible.
Source: news.google.com

Iran Says Ready to Swap Prisoners With United States . There are any Iran Says Ready to Swap Prisoners With United States  in here.


BNB Chains Seeks To Employ 30k Developers From United States

Several activities are taking place in the crypto industry amid the current market situation. One of such activities is the recent development of the BNB chain. This digital network is in the pipeline to raise additional developers in charge of web3 development.

A Brief On BNB

Binance Coin (BNB) is a renowned digital currency developed and managed by the known crypto exchange, Binance. The development of the digital token was backed up by Platzi, a Latin America-driven education platform.

The digital coin was created in July 2017 and was launched with an ICO (initial coin offering). At the time, the token had about 200 million BNB coins, which the firm split into parts for specific organizations.

In the second half of 2022, the crypto exchange platform became the largest worldwide. At the time, its volume was up to $7.6 billion.

Initially, the Binance coin was not a stand-alone network. Instead, it operated under the Ethereum (ETH) blockchain, the ERC 20 standard.

BNB Chains Seeks To Employ 30k Developers From United States
Ethereum trades above $1,800 on the chart | Source: ETHUSDT on TradingView.com

Currently, the digital token operates under its blockchain called the Binance chain network. Also, several investors and traders in the crypto industry use BNB tokens for different transactions.

The New Development Of The BNB Chain

Recently, the development parties of the crypto network have announced a new development based on the blockchain. This has to do with introducing a regional web3 course. The idea here is to create more accessible access to the course, making it reachable to 30,000 participants before the year runs out.

One of the course’s main objectives is to expand developers’ skills. Binance Chain investment director, Gwendolyn Regina, cited this in an interview with our source.

This course is essential given that several users of digital currencies still lack an adequate understanding of the technology. A survey from Motley Fool revealed the responses from certain users of the technology. According to the survey, about 10% of the respondents admitted that they do not understand the technology operations.

This sort of report and more are the main push for the development of the course. Moreover, Regina cited that education and accessibility are significant barriers to entrance regarding blockchain technology. The course development aims to increase the technology’s broader adoption.

There are certain regions where crypto development is of great necessity. For example, Latin America can use this opportunity to develop its local population.

To this effect, the course will get across to such areas to empower the residents with the knowledge of blockchain technology. In addition, this education will benefit the natives’ financial and traditional institutions.

Featured Image from Pixabay and chart from TradingView.com
Thanks for visiting our article BNB Chains Seeks To Employ 30k Developers From United States | Bitcoinist.com. Please share it with kind.
Source: news.google.com

BNB Chains Seeks To Employ 30k Developers From United States | Bitcoinist.com. There are any BNB Chains Seeks To Employ 30k Developers From United States | Bitcoinist.com in here.


Between abortion rights, crime, racial tensions, politics and inflation—not to mention a never-ending pandemic—it’s been a rough time in the United States, leaving many Americans wondering what else is out there.

Every year, the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) ranks the best places to live around the world in the Global Liveability Index 2022, as well as the worst places to live. This year, the list looked at 172 cities and based the ranking on a number of categories, including stability, healthcare, culture, education and infrastructure.

Vienna, Austria, was named the best place to live in the world, followed by Copenhagen at number two, Zurich at number three and Calgary at number four. In fact, many European and Canadian cities dominated the list of best cities to live, due to factors like stability and good infrastructure.

But what about the United States? This year, the U.S. didn’t crack the list of 10 best places to live—or even the top 25, for that matter.

The highest ranked U.S. city was Atlanta, coming in at number 26 on the overall list—making it the best city to live in the country, but only the 26th best place to live in the world. Next up on the list was Washington D.C. at 29, followed by Honolulu at 30, and Pittsburgh at number 36. Los Angeles rounded out the top five list for the U.S.

So what gives? “Many of [the U.S. cities] scored relatively low in the areas of stability and healthcare when compared to some of the top ranking cities in Europe and Canada,” says Upasana Dutt, head of Liveability Index at EIU. “There are a few longstanding structural factors that impede many U.S. cities from challenging other cities in advanced economies at the top of the rankings, such as a greater incidence of social unrest, which is often rooted in the country’s ongoing racial inequalities.”

Another issue: “U.S. cities also have an extraordinarily expensive healthcare system that is capable of delivering high-quality care but only to those who can afford it,” says Dutt.

But it wasn’t all bad news for the United States. The top 10 U.S. cities were still in the top tier of liveability (defined as the score of 80 and above). “These cities, including the more populous ones, such as Los Angeles and Chicago, all score exceptionally well in the culture and education categories,” says Dutt.

Other positive areas for the U.S.: “In the latest edition, U.S. cities witnessed considerable improvements in the culture and environment, healthcare and education categories, which were earlier affected by the pandemic,” says Dutt. “These improvements are attributable to the reopening of facilities, removal of restrictions, and the reduction in waiting times for access to public and healthcare services.”

At least the U.S. didn’t rank as one of the 10 worst places to live in the world. But still, we have a long way to go.

Read on for the ranking of the best U.S. cities to live and the best places to live in the world .

The 10 Best Places to Live in the U.S.

Here are the top 10 cities in the U.S. and where they ranked on the overall Most Liveable Cities List.

  1. Atlanta (number 26 overall)
  2. Washington D.C. (number 29 overall)
  3. Honolulu, Hawaii (number 30 overall)
  4. Pittsburgh (number 36 overall)
  5. Los Angeles (number 37 overall)
  6. Seattle (number 39 overall)
  7. Miami (number 41 overall)
  8. Chicago (number 41 overall)
  9. Boston (number 45 overall)
  10. San Francisco (number 46 overall)

The 1o Best Places to Live in the World

  1. Vienna, Austria
  2. Copenhagen, Denmark
  3. Zurich, Switzerland
  4. Calgary, Canada
  5. Vancouver, Canada
  6. Geneva, Switzerland
  7. Frankfurt, Germany
  8. Toronto, Canada
  9. Amsterdam, Netherlands
  10. Osaka, Japan and Melbourne, Australia (tie)

READ MORE:

Student Loan Forgiveness: Is Travel The Answer?

Crime In America: Study Reveals The 10 Most Unsafe Cities (It’s Not Where You Think)

Thanks for visiting our article The US Is Not One Of The World’s Best Places To Live: Here’s Why. Please share it with responsible.
Source: news.google.com

The US Is Not One Of The World’s Best Places To Live: Here’s Why. There are any The US Is Not One Of The World’s Best Places To Live: Here’s Why in here.


US-China Tech Export Approval Rate Proof of Policy Failure, Says Ex-Pentagon Analyst

Strident-sounding U.S. tech sanctions on China don't bite very hard. Official data from the Commerce Department shows the U.S. approves almost all tech export requests to China, according to a new Wall Street Journal report. 

The data reveals that, in 2020, of the <0.5% of exports to China that required a license to be exported, 95% were approved. In 2021, the approval rate dropped to 88% — meaning nearly nine out of 10 tech export licenses were still greenlit. 

Remember, the purpose of these sanctions is to deny China access to technology which could be purposed (or re-purposed) for use in military equipment. This implementation is falling by the wayside, according to critics who have seen the figures. Important U.S. semiconductors, AI technologies, and even aerospace components are still getting approved for export, according to the WSJ. 

A prominent critic of these lax controls is Steve Coonen, a former Pentagon China export controls analyst. Coonen, who resigned from his position at the Pentagon nearly a year ago, reckons the figures highlighted by the WSJ are evidence of significant policy failure.

The crux of the issue seems to stem from the pressure on the Commerce Department to carry out its central purpose — promoting U.S. exports — and how this currently overwhelms the question of export controls (particularly with regard to China). 

Not everyone believes the current policy is worth pushing. Some are worried U.S. export controls will damage U.S. businesses while providing clear opportunities for rivals in high-tech nations such as Japan, Germany, and South Korea. 

The WSJ report references the findings of U.S. Rep. Michael McCaul of Texas, which highlight the fact that blacklisted Chinese companies such as Huawei and SMIC were issued with more than $100 billion worth of export license between November 2020 and April 2021. Blacklisted entities aren't automatically denied exports, they just have to apply for a license — which is often granted. It is also thought non-blacklisted entities might be used to get tech imports into China, which are then diverted to blacklisted companies. 

SMIC headquarters

(Image credit: SMIC)

SMIC has been shipping 7nm chips, based on tech copied from TSMC, since 2021. The U.S. export controls process was supposed to have been a significant hurdle to China getting hold of advanced semiconductors (and the means to produce them). 

Successive U.S. administrations have fiercely gnashed their teeth at China, but the trade figures suggest this policy is a lot of talk rather than something that has ever been strictly implemented. 

Thanks for visiting our article US-China Tech Export Approval Rate Proof of Policy Failure, Says Ex-Pentagon Analyst | Tom's Hardware. Please share it with responsible.
Source: news.google.com

US-China Tech Export Approval Rate Proof of Policy Failure, Says Ex-Pentagon Analyst | Tom's Hardware. There are any US-China Tech Export Approval Rate Proof of Policy Failure, Says Ex-Pentagon Analyst | Tom's Hardware in here.


Here's Why It's Important To Do It Accurately

No one wants to start or end their vacation by spending thousands of dollars on an unexpected expense — especially when it’s cheap airport food. But two passengers recently made headlines after receiving fines of more than $1800 for bringing a Subway sandwich and, separately, McMuffins into Australia.

It’s not just Australia that imposes such hefty fines. Many countries do so in an effort to keep out pests and diseases — including the United States. In 2018, a woman had an apple in her bag when she reached US border control. She ended up with a $500 fine.

While local food is one of the best things you can bring back from your travels for yourself or your loved ones, not all food is clear. These are the things to know to avoid getting a fine or delay on your way back into the US.

How to safely bring food into the United States

Bringing food into the US is pretty simple. When you receive the Customs Declaration Form, be sure to accurately fill out section 11, which asks if you’re bringing in any agricultural products or if you visited any farmland during your trip. Once you declare your items, a US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) specialist can make sure your items are free of plant, pests, and animal diseases that can negatively impact the environment. If it’s determined that what you claimed is contaminated, it’s destroyed.

Failure to claim what you’re bringing in, however, can result in up to $10,000 in fines and penalties.

The foods you can’t bring into the United States

A general rule of thumb is that any foods that can carry infectious diseases are not allowed entry. It makes sense why: A major pest or disease outbreak can disrupt ecosystems and result in higher grocery bills, shortages of certain foods, and losses for farmers, according to the Department of Agriculture. Items purchased in Hawaii and other US territories like Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, and Guam are also held to many of the same strict rules as other countries because they are not attached to the country’s mainland and therefore pose the same risks to the mainland ecosystem.

Foods you can’t bring into the US include:

  • Almost all fresh and frozen fruits and vegetables
  • Most dried fruits and vegetables
  • Most poultry, cattle, swine, sheep or goat meat, or meat products from countries affected with certain serious livestock diseases
  • Whole coffee berries
  • Coca, barberry, and loose citrus leaves
  • Spices made from oranges, lemons, limes, and other citrus leaves and seeds, and many vegetable and fruit seeds
  • Milk and dairy items from countries with foot-and-mouth disease
  • Most eggs or egg products from countries affected with certain serious poultry diseases

Mexico exception:
Certain exceptions are made when traveling from Mexico. Most fruits and vegetables are allowed to enter. Stone fruit, apples, mangoes, oranges, guavas, sopote, cherimoya and sweet limes from Mexico require a permit. Avocados from Mexico must be peeled, halved, have the seed removed, and stored in liquid or vacuum-packed may enter but are subject to inspection. Most meat, poultry, egg, and dairy products can also be brought into the US, except for pork, unless it’s a small amount that’s thoroughly cooked.

Canada exception:
There are certain exceptions made traveling from Canada to the US. Most meat, poultry, egg, and dairy products can be brought into the US for personal use. Most fruits and vegetables are also allowed to be carried across the border, except for bananas, European blackberries, cherries grown in the Ontario province, allium, citrus, papaya, peppers, pineapples, and tomatoes.

The food you can bring into the United States

Customs and Border Patrol suggests keeping receipts and original packaging of agricultural products to prove where you purchased them. Additionally, if you’re bringing in large amounts of a certain food, you may be subject to extra screening as even permitted foods are only allowed for personal use.

Foods you can bring into the US include:

  • Commercially canned fruits and vegetables
  • Dried beans, dates, figs, nuts (but not chestnuts or acorns), okra, peas, raisins and Szechwan peppercorns
  • Commercially-packaged and labeled, cooked, shelf-stable meat and poultry items
  • Most seafood
  • Roasted and unroasted coffee beans
  • Teas, herbal teas, and infusions commercially packaged and ready to be boiled, steeped or microwaved in liquid
  • Honey
  • Most dried spices
  • Butter, butter oil, olive oil, and other vegetable oils
  • Solid hard or soft cheeses that don’t contain meat
  • Liquid milk and powdered or dry milk products intended for use by infants or very young children in a reasonable amount
  • Products containing powdered or dry milk (baking mixes, soup mixes, drink mixes) in small quantities
  • Commercially-packaged and labeled, cooked, shelf-stable, fully finished milk and dairy items in unopened packages
  • Eggshells with egg white and egg yolk removed that are decorated/etched/painted
  • Moon cakes that do not contain meat, egg, or egg yolk unless the eggs appear “thoroughly cooked throughout”
  • Ketchup (catsup), mustard, mayonnaise, Marmite, Vegemite, and prepared sauces that do not contain meat products
  • Bread, cookies, crackers, cakes, granola bars, cereal, and other baked and processed products
  • Candy and chocolate
  • Juices that are commercially packaged
  • Flour
  • Mushrooms that are fresh, dried, and the above the ground parts that are clean and free of soil
  • Aloe, above ground parts
  • Coconuts that are dry and without husks that haven’t sprouted
  • Peeled garlic cloves
  • Ginger with clean roots

Remember, even if you forget some of these rules, as long as you declare all the agricultural products you bring, you will not face any penalties — even if an inspector determines they cannot enter the country.

Thanks for reading our article Declaring Food at Customs: Here's Why It's Important To Do It Accurately. Please share it with kind.
Source: news.google.com

Declaring Food at Customs: Here's Why It's Important To Do It Accurately. There are any Declaring Food at Customs: Here's Why It's Important To Do It Accurately in here.


Haymes Snedeker, Brandt's older brother, competes in U.S. Am and marvels at talent

PARAMUS, N.J. – Haymes Snedeker is 46 years old; a young 46 on most days, but on this Tuesday afternoon, he was feeling every bit his age.

Snedeker, the older brother of Brandt Snedeker, had just wrapped up his first U.S. Amateur in two decades, posting 19 over in 36 holes around The Ridgewood Country Club, the A.W. Tillinghast gem that the gray-bearded Snedeker called “the toughest golf course I’ve ever played.”

“It's almost like I’ve been in a foxhole for two days – guns going off, a little bit of shellshock,” Snedeker said. “I think it’ll take a couple days to appreciate the fact that I’m here. I didn’t just want to make it here; I wanted to play well, and I put a little too much pressure on myself.”


Full-field scores from the U.S. Amateur


That competitive spirit still burns inside the older Snedeker brother, even after all these years, and even as the talent gap has widened considerably between Snedeker and today’s college studs. Distance especially; Haymes reckoned he had about 220 yards into at least five par-4s at Ridgewood.

Following Haymes’ opening 83, what he estimates is the worst score he’s ever posted in a USGA championship, he received a text from Brandt, who at 41 has experienced something similar out on Tour.

Part of Brandt’s message: “Welcome to my world.”

“Everyone’s 20 years younger and they hit the ball 30 yards past you, and they’re in good shape, and they’re just better all around. He’s like, ‘I have to play four great rounds of golf, flawless, to beat these kids,’ and I feel the same way. These college kids, I’ve never seen anything like it. They have no fear … and I’m a shell of my former self.”

Born five years before Brandt, Haymes was an all-conference player his senior year at Ole Miss in 1999, but unlike his brother, now a nine-time Tour winner and Ryder Cupper, Haymes knew his professional prospects were limited. A four-time academic All-American, Haymes remained amateur and instead went to law school and eventually became one of the nation’s youngest municipal court judges at age 32.

In his 20s, he teed it up in a few USGA championships, reaching the Round of 16 at the 2002 U.S. Amateur Public Links, the year before Brandt won, and that same year qualifying for both the U.S. Amateur and U.S. Mid-Amateur.

He did turn pro briefly after winning Big Break in 2008 – he only sent in an application at the urging of his brother – but he logged just one Tour start, alongside Brandt at the 2009 event at Disney. He got his amateur status back a few years later and qualified for the 2013 U.S. Mid-Amateur, his last USGA event prior to this week.

Now the father of two teenagers and the co-founder of a successful real estate development firm in Fairhope, Alabama, Haymes probably didn’t have the type of competitive golf career that he once envisioned as a kid, but looking back, it’s hard to complain as he stands just off the 18th green at Ridgewood having just teed it up with the best amateurs in the world – and as he notes, less than 10 years from being eligible for the U.S. Senior Amateur.

“I’ve gotten to follow Brandt for all these years, so that’s kind of filled the void for golf,” said Haymes, who attends a few of Brandt’s tournaments a year and caddied for his brother when he was an amateur at the 2004 Masters. “I live vicariously through him.”

One void that remains, however, is that of their parents, Larry and Candice, who died about eight months apart – Candice of a heart attack in October 2020, and Larry the following June from cancer.

The Snedekers were a close-knit family. They loved the time they spent together, their worlds happily revolving around Brandt’s remarkable career on the golf course. That was part of the reason Haymes didn’t chase pro golf harder; after college, he returned home to care for his parents after major surgeries.

“It’s been tough,” Haymes says. “We think about them every day. You know, we both play golf wanting to make our parents proud. Other than just our own pride and competitive nature, you want to make your parents proud, and I think that’s been a difficulty for both of us not having them here. We’re still making them proud, but they’re not around to really see it. … There’s nothing more I would’ve loved than to have them here. They would’ve been here and eaten up every second.”

Haymes especially misses the phone calls. Whether it was Brandt leaving the golf course or Haymes leaving the office, they’d often call mom and dad.

Instead, on Monday evening, it was Brandt reaching out to his brother over the phone. They didn’t have many highlights to go over, but Brandt told Haymes not to worry, to go out Tuesday and just “enjoy the walk.”

“Soak it up,” Haymes recounts, “because you don’t know if you’ll ever make it back.”

Though Ridgewood had left him feeling beaten, both physically and mentally, Haymes knows he’ll soon relish this moment.

After the journey his career has taken him on, how could he not?

Thanks for reading our article Haymes Snedeker, Brandt's older brother, competes in U.S. Am and marvels at talent | Golf Channel. Please share it with kind.
Source: news.google.com

Haymes Snedeker, Brandt's older brother, competes in U.S. Am and marvels at talent | Golf Channel. There are any Haymes Snedeker, Brandt's older brother, competes in U.S. Am and marvels at talent | Golf Channel in here.


1 year after US military left Afghanistan, a look back at public opinion

A U.S. Air Force plane takes off from Kabul International Airport on Aug. 30, 2021, the day the U.S. completed its withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan.
A U.S. Air Force plane takes off from Kabul International Airport on Aug. 30, 2021, the day the U.S. completed its withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan. (Aamir Qureshi/AFP via Getty Images)

In August 2021, the United States withdrew the last of its troops from Afghanistan, ending its military presence there after nearly 20 years. The U.S. exit from Afghanistan resulted in the Taliban regaining control of the country and created a refugee crisis as many Afghans fled. It also raised fears that terrorists might use Afghanistan as a safe haven, as was the case with Ayman al-Zawahiri, the al-Qaida leader who was discovered in the nation’s capital, Kabul, and killed in a U.S. drone strike late last month.

A year after the U.S. military exit from Afghanistan, here’s a look back at how people in the United States and other countries have viewed the troop evacuation and its aftermath, as well as their broader attitudes about the war. All findings are based on previously published Pew Research Center surveys.

This Pew Research Center analysis examines Americans’ views of the troop withdrawal from Afghanistan and its aftermath. It is based on recent surveys conducted by the Center. Links to these surveys, including information about the field dates, sample sizes and other methodological details, are available in the text.

At the time of the military evacuation, 54% of Americans said the decision to withdraw U.S. troops from Afghanistan was the right one, according to a survey conducted in August 2021. Around four-in-ten Americans (42%) said the decision was the wrong one. There was a sharp partisan divide on this topic. While 70% of Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents said the decision to withdraw troops was the right decision, about half as many Republicans and GOP leaners (34%) shared this view. Most Republicans (64%) instead said the decision was wrong.

A bar chart showing that the public backs the Afghan troop pullout but gives Biden low marks for handling situation

In the same survey, 69% of U.S. adults said the United States mostly failed in achieving its goals in Afghanistan. About a quarter (27%) said the U.S. succeeded. There was partisan agreement on this question: About seven-in-ten in both parties said the U.S. mostly failed to achieve its goals.

Americans harbored doubts about the war in Afghanistan even before the withdrawal of U.S. troops. In a spring 2019 survey, 59% of U.S. adults said that considering the costs versus the benefits to the United States, the war in Afghanistan was not worth fighting, while 36% said it was. The balance of opinion was about the same among U.S. military veterans.

Both during and after the troop withdrawal, large majorities of Americans expressed negative views of the Biden administration’s handling of the situation in Afghanistan. In both August and September 2021, about seven-in-ten or more said that the administration had done an only fair or poor job dealing with the situation there, with around four-in-ten or more saying it had done poorly. In both surveys, fewer Americans said the administration had done an excellent or good job. In the September survey, for instance, only 24% said this.

A bar chart showing that a majority of Democrats say the Biden administration has done an only fair or poor job of dealing with Afghanistan

A large majority of Republicans (82%) said in September 2021 that the administration had done a poor job handling the situation in Afghanistan. Conservative Republicans were 21 percentage points more likely than moderate and liberal Republicans to say this (89% vs. 68%).

One-in-five Democrats also said the Biden administration had done a poor job dealing with the Afghanistan situation. About twice as many said the administration had done an only fair job (38%) or an excellent or good job (40%).

Veterans and non-veterans were also divided on this question. While similar shares of veterans (76%) and non-veterans (74%) said in September 2021 that the Biden administration had done an only fair or poor job dealing with the situation in Afghanistan, veterans were more likely than non-veterans to say the administration handled it poorly (60% vs. 47%). Only about a quarter or fewer in either group said the administration had done an excellent or good job, with very few giving it an excellent rating (4% of veterans and 5% of non-veterans). As is the case with the general public, veterans’ views on these issues are deeply divided along party lines.

Last September, a majority of Americans (56%) said they favored admitting thousands of Afghan refugees into the U.S., according to the same survey, which was conducted after the U.S. evacuated thousands of Afghans from the country. About four-in-ten (42%) opposed this move.

A bar chart showing that liberal Democrats are the most likely to favor admitting refugees from Afghanistan

These views were deeply divided by partisanship. At the time, 63% of Republicans either strongly (29%) or somewhat (34%) opposed the U.S. admitting thousands of refugees from Afghanistan into the country. About a third (35%) said they favored admitting these refugees.

By contrast, three-quarters of Democrats were in favor of admitting refugees, including a third who strongly favored it. Liberal Democrats (87%) were more likely than conservative and moderate Democrats (66%) to support this. About half of liberal Democrats (49%) said they strongly favored admitting refugees from Afghanistan.

Despite majority support for admitting refugees, Americans were divided on whether the government was conducting adequate security screenings for those arriving in the U.S. from Afghanistan. About four-in-ten Americans (43%) said they were very or somewhat confident that the government was conducting adequate security screenings, while 55% were not too confident or not at all confident. Democrats were more likely than Republicans to express confidence in the government’s security screenings. 

In a spring 2022 survey of 18 countries, people viewed the U.S. decision to withdraw all troops from Afghanistan as the right one, but many said the withdrawal itself was not handled well. A median of 52% across the surveyed countries said the troop pullout was the right choice, compared with a median of 39% who said it was the wrong choice.

Public opinion in these countries was more negative when it came to how the U.S. exit from Afghanistan was handled. A median of 56% said it was not handled well, while a median of 33% said it was. In only two surveyed countries, Poland and Malaysia, did half or more of adults approve of the way the situation in Afghanistan was handled.

Most Americans said in August 2021 that Taliban control of Afghanistan is a threat to the security of the United States. Nearly half (46%) said Taliban control represented a major threat to the U.S., and another 44% saw it as a minor threat. Republicans (61%) were far more likely than Democrats (33%) to view a Taliban-controlled Afghanistan as a major security threat.

A bar chart showing that strengthening the economy is the public’s top concern, followed by cutting health costs and addressing COVID-19

In a January 2022 survey, 55% of Americans said that defending against terrorism should be a top priority for the president and Congress to address this year. Of the 18 issues asked about, defending against terrorism was among the top priorities identified. The survey preceded the U.S. military’s drone strike on al-Qaida leader Ayman al-Zawahiri in Kabul in July.

Americans tend to prioritize the terrorism issue differently based on factors including age and partisanship. About three-quarters of adults ages 65 and older (76%) said that defending against terrorism should be a top priority for the president and Congress, compared with 32% of those under 30. And roughly two-thirds of Republicans (65%) said it should be a top priority, compared with 48% of Democrats.

Thanks for visiting our article 1 year after US military left Afghanistan, a look back at public opinion | Pew Research Center. Please share it with responsible.
Source: news.google.com

1 year after US military left Afghanistan, a look back at public opinion | Pew Research Center. There are any 1 year after US military left Afghanistan, a look back at public opinion | Pew Research Center in here.


US retail sales little changed in July as auto, fuel buying drop | Retail News

US retail sales stagnated last month on declines in auto purchases and gasoline prices, though gains in other categories suggested consumer spending remains resilient.

The value of overall retail purchases was flat last month after a revised 0.8% jump in June, Commerce Department data showed Wednesday. Excluding gasoline and autos, retail sales rose a better-than-expected 0.7%. The figures aren’t adjusted for inflation.

Value of total purchases were near flat, though solid excluding gasoline, autos

The median estimate in a Bloomberg survey of economists called for a 0.1% rise in retail sales.

For many Americans, the significant pullback in gasoline prices has boosted sentiment and likely freed up cash to spend elsewhere. Even so, widespread and persistently high inflation is eroding workers’ paychecks and forcing many to lean on on credit cards and savings to keep up. That presents an enduring headwind to the resilience of consumers in the months ahead.

Sales at gasoline stations fell 1.8% in July, reflecting a steady retreat in gas prices from the record highs seen in mid-June. Purchases at motor vehicle and parts dealers dropped 1.6%.

Meantime, sales picked up elsewhere. Nine of the 13 retail categories showed increases last month, according to the report, including building material stores, nonstore retailers and electronics. Prior to July, overall retail sales had risen every month this year.

A pullback in consumer spending — the main engine of US growth — is a necessary element in the Federal Reserve’s inflation fight. Policy makers are seeking to cool the economy enough to tame price increases, but not so much as to cause a recession or drive a surge in unemployment. Wednesday’s report is one of many data points the central bank will consider when deciding the size of another rate hike next month.

Treasury yields held gains and US stock futures remained lower after the data, which suggested consumer discretionary spending is solid enough to keep the Fed on a path of aggressive interest-rate hikes.

Earnings out this week have also shed light on the health of US consumers. After slashing its outlook a few weeks ago, Walmart Inc. said results improved more than expected in late July thanks to robust back-to-school sales, lower fuel prices and more buying by wealthier customers seeking bargains — a likely byproduct of inflation. Home Depot Inc. earnings beat estimates, but customer transactions fell for a fifth-straight quarter.

Target Corp., however, missed even the lowest profit estimates as the company cut prices on home appliances, patio furniture and other discretionary items to right-size inventory.

Grocery store sales were up 0.2%, likely reflecting rising food prices rather than a significant uptick in purchasing activity. Data out last week showed the cost of groceries has surged 13.1% in the last year, the most since 1979. Sales at restaurants and bars, the only services’ component in the report, climbed 0.1%, the weakest print since a decline in January.

The retail sales report primarily focuses on goods, not services. Consumers have been shifting back toward pre-pandemic spending patterns, which leans more on services like entertainment and travel, and away from the merchandise-heavy tilt of the past two years. A fuller picture of spending in July, which includes both services spending and inflation-adjusted figures, will be released later this month.

Sales receipts at nonstore retailers — which includes e-commerce — climbed 2.7%. Amazon.com Inc.’s Prime Day, which occurred mid-month, likely played a role. The event was the largest on record, according to the company, as members bought more than 300 million items globally.

So-called control group sales — which are used to calculate gross domestic product and exclude food services, auto dealers, building materials stores and gasoline stations — were up a better-than-forecast 0.8%, matching the strongest since January.

–With assistance from Jordan Yadoo and Brendan Case.

Thanks for watching our article US retail sales little changed in July as auto, fuel buying drop | Retail News | Al Jazeera. Please share it with responsible.
Source: news.google.com

US retail sales little changed in July as auto, fuel buying drop | Retail News | Al Jazeera. There are any US retail sales little changed in July as auto, fuel buying drop | Retail News | Al Jazeera in here.


To continue, please click the box below to let us know you're not a robot.

Thanks for reading our article Bloomberg - Are you a robot?. Please share it with pleasure.
Source: news.google.com

Bloomberg - Are you a robot?. There are any Bloomberg - Are you a robot? in here.


The American states of Arizona and Nevada will again face cuts in the amount of water they can draw from the Colorado River. Federal officials announced the cuts this week as the western states are experiencing extremely dry weather conditions.

The cuts planned for next year will force states to decide where and how to reduce water usage. The decision will put more pressure on the states with a growing population in a hotter, drier future.

“We are taking steps to protect the 40 million people who depend on the Colorado River for their lives and livelihoods,” said Camille Touton. She leads the U.S Bureau of Reclamation which oversees water policy for the river.

The Colorado River provides water across seven American states and Mexico. Its water helps support an agricultural industry valued at $15 billion a year. The federal estimates of the water levels will also determine how much states and cities can draw for their water supply.

In addition to those cuts, the Bureau of Reclamation said Tuesday that states had missed a deadline to propose at least 15 percent more cuts needed to keep the water levels at the lakes, or reservoirs, from dropping even more.

For example, officials have predicted that water levels at Lake Mead, the nation’s largest reservoir, will drop severely. The lake is currently less than a quarter full.

“The states collectively have not identified and adopted specificactions of sufficient magnitude that would stabilize the system,” Touton said.

In Arizona, the state placed all its water reduction last year on the agricultural industry. Now, officials will have to decide whether to spread additional pain to growing cities that depend on the river. The cuts are not expected to have a considerable effect on Nevada. It already has one of the strongest water conservation policies in the West.

The cut is planned for next year only. But, University of Oxford researcher Kevin Wheeler said the science shows it will likely remain for much longer.

“It’s pretty clear that these reductions just have to stay in place until the drought has ended or we realize they actually have to get worse and the cuts have to get deeper."

The cuts are based on a plan the seven states and Mexico signed in 2019 to help maintain reservoir levels. Under that plan, the amount of water set aside for states depends on the water levels at Lake Mead.

Last year, the lake fell low enough for the U.S. government to declare a first-ever water shortage in the area. The declaration forced required cuts for Arizona and Nevada as well as Mexico in 2022.

Officials expect the falling lake levels to bring additional cuts to Nevada, Arizona, and Mexico next year. Other states with higher claims to water rights are not expected to see cuts.

Reservoir levels have been falling for years — and faster than experts predicted — after 22 years of dry weather. Climate change and overuse of the river have worsened the situation.

Hot temperatures and less snow have reduced the amount of water flowing from the Rocky Mountains, where the river starts to wind its way 2,334 kilometers into the Gulf of Mexico.

Already, officials have held back millions of cubic meters of water in Lake Powell. It is the other large Colorado River reservoir sitting upstream from Lake Mead along the Arizona-Utah border. Water from the lake runs through Glen Canyon Dam, which produces enough electricity to power between 1 million and 1.5 million homes each year.

As water levels at Lake Powell reached levels low enough to threaten water-based power production, federal officials said they would hold back an additional 592 million cubic meters of water to ensure the dam could still produce energy. That water would normally flow to Lake Mead.

Under the new reductions, Arizona will lose slightly more water than it did this year, when 18 percent of its supply was cut. In 2023, it will lose an additional 3 percent. Nevada will lose about 8 percent of its supply. Last year, Nevada lost 7 percent.

Mexico will lose 7 percent of the amount of water it receives each year from the river. Last year, it lost about 5 percent. The water is a lifeline for northern desert cities including Tijuana and a large farm industry in the Mexicali Valley, just south of the border from California’s Imperial Valley.

I'm Caty Weaver.

The Associated Press reported this story. Hai Do adapted the story for Learning English.

___________________________________________________________________

determine - v. to officially decide something because of evidence or facts

adopt - v. to formally accept or approve something

sufficient - adj. having as much as needed

magnitude - n. the size, importance, or extent of something

stabilize - v. to make something steady

maintain - v. to continue without changing

Thanks for visiting our article US States Will Get Less Water in Dry Weather. Please share it with responsible.
Source: news.google.com

US States Will Get Less Water in Dry Weather. There are any US States Will Get Less Water in Dry Weather in here.


Vasiliy Lomachenko back in USA ahead of fall return to boxing

Vasiliy Lomachenko’s return to the boxing ring is in full motion, as the former three-division champion and pound-for-pound list mainstay has arrived in the United States to get back into training for a likely return in the fall.

At last update, Top Rank were planning to have Lomachenko (16-2, 11 KO) back in October, perhaps, which would line him up with the current plan for the Haney vs Kambosos rematch on Oct. 15 (Oct. 16 in Australia).

If the 34-year-old Lomachenko wins his next fight, Top Rank would obviously want to match him with Haney, assuming Haney beats Kambosos again as he will be heavily favored to do. Top Rank have an ongoing deal with Haney, and the biggest and easiest fight for them to make in that scenario would be Haney vs Lomachenko.

It’s also a fight that Lomachenko avoided back in 2019, which created the entire debacle with the “WBC Franchise” title and various bogus claims to undisputed champion status thereafter. Haney now is the actual undisputed champion. There are very easy angles for promotion on Haney vs Lomachenko.

But first, of course, they both have to win. Lomachenko is coming back from Ukraine, where he was in the middle of a war. Some people will say, “Well, it’s not like he was on the front lines,” and true, probably not, but that’s still a lot to see and experience that goes far beyond a normal everyday life for most.

Loma last fought this past December, dominating Richard Commey over 12 rounds, and went 2-0 in 2021.

There’s been no major speculation on Lomachenko’s return foe, but there will be plenty of options. Namibia’s Jeremiah Nakathila (23-2, 19 KO) may well fit the bill. The 32-year-old has fought on a pair of Top Rank shows and impressed last time out with a sixth round stoppage of Miguel Berchelt.

As far as in-house Top Rank options at 135, there’s also 28-year-old Giovanni Cabrera (21-0, 7 KO), coming off of a July 23 win over Gabriel Flores Jr, or 26-year-old Jamaine Ortiz (16-0-1, 8 KO), who beat Jamel Herring on May 21. Japan’s Shuichiro Yoshino (15-0, 11 KO) may also make sense from a sanctioning body point of view.

Thanks for reading our article Vasiliy Lomachenko back in USA ahead of fall return to boxing - Bad Left Hook. Please share it with responsible.
Source: news.google.com

Vasiliy Lomachenko back in USA ahead of fall return to boxing - Bad Left Hook. There are any Vasiliy Lomachenko back in USA ahead of fall return to boxing - Bad Left Hook in here.


To continue, please click the box below to let us know you're not a robot.

Thanks for watching our article Bloomberg - Are you a robot?. Please share it with responsible.
Source: news.google.com

Bloomberg - Are you a robot?. There are any Bloomberg - Are you a robot? in here.


Final week to qualify for U.S. and International Presidents Cup teams

This is the final week of qualifying for the Presidents Cup. At the conclusion of the BMW Championship, the top six players in points for the U.S. and the top eight in points for the Internationals, will earn spots on their respective teams.

The event will be held at Quail Hollow Club in Charlotte, North Carolina, Sept. 22-25.

Here are the players who are currently inside the cut line for both teams:

United States

  • 1. Scottie Scheffler 
  • 2. Patrick Cantlay 
  • 3. Sam Burns 
  • 4. Xander Schauffele 
  • 5. Justin Thomas 
  • 6. Tony Finau 

Internationals

  • 1. Cameron Smith 
  • 2. Hideki Matsuyama 
  • 3. Sungjae Im 
  • 4. Joaquin Niemann
  • 5. Joohyung Kim
  • 6. Corey Conners 
  • 7. Adam Scott
  • 8. Mito Pereira 

Will Zalatoris is currently in the seventh position for United States, following his triumph at last week’s FedEx St. Jude Championship. Jordan Spieth is eighth, Collin Morikawa ninth and Max Homa 10th.

Only Zalatoris and Spieth could crack the top six after this week, based on current standings and point allotment for the BMW Championship.

On the International side, three of the players from nine through 12 in the standings are in the field in Delaware, but there was little shifting after the playoff opener and it will be difficult for anyone to surpass Pereira.

U.S. captain Davis Love III (six) and International captain Trevor Immelman (four) will reveal their captain’s picks on Aug. 29.

Thanks for watching our article Final week to qualify for U.S. and International Presidents Cup teams | Golf Channel. Please share it with responsible.
Source: news.google.com

Final week to qualify for U.S. and International Presidents Cup teams | Golf Channel. There are any Final week to qualify for U.S. and International Presidents Cup teams | Golf Channel in here.


The US must compensate burn pit victims in Iraq too | Health

On August 10, United States President Joe Biden signed the PACT Act, aiding approximately 3.5 million American veterans with severe medical conditions linked to toxic exposure to burn pits during service, including in Iraq and Afghanistan. Open air pits of military waste, sometimes as large as football fields, are burned to destroy munitions, chemicals, plastics, and medical and human waste, typically using jet fuel. Used widely until at least 2010, burn pits were still permitted at least as of last year, when waste management facilities were not available.

Their impact, however, extends beyond the harm to those who were deployed and exposed to toxins in the short term. Fatal cancers. Birth defects that can cause infant death or lifelong disabilities. Malformations including a missing hand, cleft lip and paralysed club foot. Anencephaly — an underdeveloped brain and incomplete skull. These are just some of the devastating conditions plaguing Iraqi civilians following toxic exposure from the 2003 US invasion and occupation and 1991 Gulf War.

How is this a fair price for civilians to pay for simply residing in their homes while the US “war on terror” forcibly exposed them to burn pits and depleted uranium? When will the US fulfill international law obligations to compensate them for the toxic war zones that its military has left behind?

Biden’s signing last week was filled with fanfare and applause, and a moving appearance by the wife and young child of the late Ohio veteran in whose honour the act is named (full title: the Sergeant First Class Heath Robinson Honoring our Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxics (PACT) Act). Indeed, the legislation is welcome: It covers numerous cancers and lung conditions, and marks progress toward addressing dire suffering similar to that of Vietnam veterans who were unjustly neglected (PDF) following Agent Orange exposure. In fact, the PACT Act addresses Agent Orange — 47 years after that war’s end.

Biden said this is “the least we can do” for veterans. Where is equivalent acknowledgment – and compensation – for Iraqi civilians, who have no escape from the kind of toxic surroundings the act aims to address for injured US veterans?

Benefit of doubt

Many of those paying the highest price are Iraqi infants born two decades after the start of the “war on terror”. According to Dutch peace organisation PAX, more than 780,000 rounds of depleted uranium were fired in 1991, and more than 300,000 rounds in 2003.

Diseases linked to genetic damage in Fallujah, which was contaminated with depleted uranium munitions, have been documented at higher rates than in Hiroshima.

The PACT Act provides “presumptive conditions” benefits that remove the burden of proof. Instead, veterans will be presumed eligible according to dates and locations of service. Previously, nearly four in five burn pits-connected Veterans Affairs (VA) claims were rejected.

This same benefit of the doubt must be extended to Iraqis through a presumptive benefits-style programme. The US must not delay clean-up and compensation for decades, as with Vietnam. There is more than enough data to justify reparations. Petty, minutiae-rooted arguments can be used to fixate on documentation of the precise dates and nature of civilians’ toxic exposure. Yet, there is ample evidence of what I call “toxic saturation” — the long-term, undeniable, accumulative encounters of Iraqi civilians with a variety of deadly toxins. As Iraqi novelist and poet Sinan Antoon asks: “Do we breathe to live? Or do we breathe to die?”

The law is clear. Article 91 of Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions says that violators of international humanitarian law are “liable to pay compensation.” The Environmental Modification Convention (ENMOD) forbids military “environmental modification techniques having widespread, long-lasting or severe effects as the means of destruction, damage or injury.”

There are abundant international regulations that are in conflict with US actions regarding toxins. Article 55 of Additional Protocol I to the Geneva Conventions prohibits means of warfare that damage the environment and “prejudice the health or survival of the population”. The Rio Declaration calls for states to “develop national law regarding liability and compensation” for victims of environmental damage.

Members of the US Congress were not concerned with international law, however, when finally compensating veterans. They acted once they could not resist pressure any longer. US leaders likely fear that compensation would admit US culpability for Iraqi civilians’ injuries. The harm caused, however, is obvious and must be remedied.

History repeats

Sadly, Washington’s track record doesn’t inspire optimism.

The US left Vietnam veterans in the cold, before finally providing presumptive benefits and benefits for Agent Orange-linked birth defects in veterans’ children. The US Court of Appeals ruled against Vietnamese people who sought to hold Dow Chemical, Monsanto and other companies accountable. The court justified this partly on the basis that dioxin was a defoliant to clear foliage, not intended to harm humans.

The US has spent roughly $400m to address Agent Orange’s environmental and health effects. USAID and Vietnam’s government have a 10-year plan costing up to $500m to clean Bien Hoa Air Base. A smaller amount, $14.5m annually, was allocated for health and disability programmes.

If this numbers game seems a bit obscure, this is because there have been many parcelled-out allocations of funding, none of which have fully ameliorated harm to Vietnam’s people. This becomes clearer when considered in relation to the US military budget of $753bn.

These precedents prove that US-funded clean-ups are possible, even as they underscore the grossly inadequate nature of projects to address the horrific, multigenerational effects of dioxin. Cancer and other crushing illnesses plague Vietnam’s survivors and their children.

The bad news? History is not simply repeating. Conditions are worsening as new benchmarks are continually set for how bad things can get.

As Vietnamese-American writer and professor Viet Thanh Nguyen writes, we can forgive the atrocities of the past but “the present is not yet finished. The present, perhaps, is always unforgivable.”

Way forward

When the Senate finally passed the PACT Act, it was in spite of Republicans who refused to support it — which was seen as retaliation for Democratic legislation on climate and healthcare. This dysfunction regarding compensating veterans provides a glimpse into how antagonistic many US lawmakers would be towards an Iraqi reparations proposal.

The US must take responsibility for toxins used by the military, and by for-profit contractors. Yet abandoning civilians abroad is horrifically consistent with the US approach to environmental racism domestically. Environmental injustice disproportionately impacts US minority communities who often live in sacrifice zones.

These realities make for an uphill struggle, though not an impossible one. The US’s recognition of veterans, while ignoring Iraqis, reveals a segregated outlook on justice. The public needs to stand in solidarity with victims of the “war on terror”. The US government must expeditiously provide reparations to Iraqis and fulfill international law obligations.

Anything less is environmental racism, and a dangerously hierarchical approach to justice.

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera’s editorial stance. 

Thanks for watching our article The US must compensate burn pit victims in Iraq too | Health | Al Jazeera. Please share it with responsible.
Source: news.google.com

The US must compensate burn pit victims in Iraq too | Health | Al Jazeera. There are any The US must compensate burn pit victims in Iraq too | Health | Al Jazeera in here.